Dampak Pertanian Organik dan Konvenional pada Biodiversitas dan Sifat Kimia Tanah pada Budi Daya Tanaman Padi Sawah
Abstract
The phenomenon of leveling off and environmental degradation that occurs as a negative impact of the excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides encourages the development of organic farming systems that can produce crop yields that are not contaminated and free from synthetic chemicals and maintain a healthier environment. The research was conducted from October to December 2022 by taking soil samples from farmers' paddy fields in Tegal Regency using an organic (Cawitali Village) and conventional or non-organic (Jembayat Village) farming system. Composite soil samples were taken from a soil depth of 0 to 20 cm from the soil surface using a soil drill on lowland rice fields with organic farming systems and conventional farming after harvest. The analysis of the chemical properties of the soil carried out was C-organic (Walkley and Black), N-total (Kjeldahl), CEC and soil bases (exch-Ca, exch-Mg, exch-K, and exch-Na), total P (25% HCl) and available P (Bray I), while the observed soil biological properties were the total number of microbial and fungal populations. The results showed that organic paddy soil's chemical and biological properties were relatively higher than conventional paddy soil's. Total fungi in organic lowland soils were lower than in conventional paddy fields. The nutrient status of C-organic and N-total in organic rice fields tended to increase compared to conventional rice fields, namely from very low to low and low to moderate, respectively. In contrast, the other nutrient statuses observed tended to remain relatively unchanged. Generally, soil biological and chemical properties were better in organic farming than in conventional farming systems.
Keywords: leveling off, organic farming, conventional farming, nutrient status
Downloads
References
Alabama Cooperative Extension System. 2019. Phosphorus Basics: Understanding phosphorus forms and their cycling in the soil. [internet]. https://www.aces.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ANR-2535-Phosphorus-Basics_041719L.pdf. [Diakses pada: 25 Desember 2022].
A review of the influences of organic farming on soil quality, crop productivity and produce quality. J Plant Nutr 45(12): 1884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2027976
Balittanah [Balai Penelitian Tanah]. 2005. Petunjuk Analisis Tanah, Air, Pupuk, dan Tanaman. Bogor: Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanah dan Agroklimat. Jakarta (ID).
Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallemstein MD, et al. 2013. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: 1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009
Codron LM, Turner BI, Cade-Menum BJ. 2005. Chemistry and dynamics of soil organic phosphorus. Dalam Phosphorus: Agriculture and the Environment, eds J. T. Sims and A.N. Sharpley (Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy), 87-121. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr46.c4
Extension University of Missouri. 2022. Nitrogen in environment: Nitrogen cycle. [internet] https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/wq252. [Diakses pada: 25 Desember 2022].
FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. 1999. Organic Agriculture. Committee on Agriculture, Rome, 25-29 January 1999.
Fertcare. 2022. Soil Carbon Sanpshot. Agriculture Victoria. [internet] https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/857607/Soil-Carbon-Snapshot-updated-May-2022.pdf. [Diakses pada: 25 Desember 2022].
Fließbach A, Oberholzer H‐R, Gunst L, Mäder P. 2007. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 118: 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.022
George TS, Richardson AE, Simpson RJ. 2005. Behaviour of plant-derived 621 extracellular phytate upon addition to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37: 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.016
Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti MG. 2011. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 30: 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355
Gouda S, Nayak S, Bishwakarma S, Kerry RG, Das G, Patra JK. 2017. Role of microbial technology in agricultural sustainability. In: Patra JK, Vishnuprasad ChN, Das G (eds). Microbial Biotechnology. Applications in Agriculture and Environment. Springer, Singapore, hlm. 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6847-8_8
Kong I, Wang YB, Zhao IN, Chen ZH. 2009. Enzyme and root activities in surface-flow constructed wetlands. Chemosphere. 76: 601-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.056
McGill WB, Cole CV. 1981. Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma. 26:267–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0
Moore G, Dolling P, Porter B, Leonard L. 1998. Soil Acidity. Dalam Soil Guide. A Handbook for Understanding and Managing Agricultural Soils. Agriculture Western Australia Bulletin No. 4343.
Nisar AB, Riar A, Ramesh A, Iqbal S, Sharma MP, Sharma SK, Bhullar GS. 2017. Soil biological activity contributing to phosphorus availability in vertisols under long-term organic and conventional agricultural management. Front. Plant Sci. 8: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01523
Nesme T, Colomb B, Hinsinger P, Watson CA. 2014. Soil phosphorus management in organic cropping systems: from current practices to avenues for a more efficient use of P resources. Dalam: Bellon S, Penvern S (eds). Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, hlm. 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3_2
R4P Network. 2016. Trends and challenges in pesticide resistance detection. Trends Plant Sci. 21:834–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.006
Richardson A, Lynch J, Ryan P, Delhaize E, Smith F, Smith S, et al. 2011. Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant Soil. 349: 121-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0950-4
Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA. 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. [internet]. Nature 485: 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11069
Shannon D, Sen AM, Johnson DB. 2002. A comparative study of the microbiology of soils managed under organic and conventional regimes. Soil Use Manage. 18: 83–274. https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2002130
Tamilselvi SM, Chinnadurai C, Hamuruga K, Arulmozhiselvan K, Balachandran D. 2015. Effect of long-term nutrient management on biological and biochemical properties of semi-arid tropical Alfisol during maize crop development stages. Ecol Indic. 48: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.001
Tang J, Leung A, Leung C, Lim BL. 2006. Hydrolisis of precipitated phytate by three distinct families of phytases. Soil Biol Biochem. 38: 1316-1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.021
Tong L, Li J, Zhu L, Zhang S, Zhou H, Lv Y, Zhu K. 2022. Effects of organic cultivation on soil fertility and soil environment quality in greenhouses. Front Soil Sci. 2:n1096735. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.1096735
Turner BJ, McKelvie ID, Haygarth PM. 2002. Characterisation of water extractable soil organic phosphorus by phosphatase hydrolysis. Soil Biol Biochem. 34:27-35.
Turner BL, Newman S, Cheesman AW, Reddy KR. 2007. Sample pretreatment and phosphorus speciation in wetland soils. Soil Sci Am J. 71: 1538-1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00144-4
Zhang CH, Liu X, Dong F, Xu J, Zheng Y, Li J. 2010. Soil microbial communities response to herbicide 2,4‐dichlorophenoxy‐acetic acid butyl ester. Eur J Soil Biol. 46: 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.12.005
Copyright (c) 2024 Lilik Tri Indriyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
View JIPI StatsCounter
