KEBIJAKAN MENUJU KEMANDIRIAN BERAS, KASUS DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS JAWA TENGAH
Abstrak
Upaya menuju kemandirian beras menjadi penting untuk mengurangi ketergantungan pangan pada negara lain, namun ini merupakan tantangan yang berat. Kebutuhan lahan untuk pembangunan menyebabkan berkurangnya lahan pertanian. Kebijakan perlindungan lahan sawah yang ada dan peningkatan produksi padi menjadi sangat strategis dalam sistem pangan, karena mencetak lahan pangan baru dihadapkan pada berbagai kendala. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Peraturan Bupati tentang RTRW Kabupaten Banyumas 2011-2031 tidak mampu sepenuhnya mencegah konversi lahan sawah. Konversi lahan sawah ini menyebabkan pasokan beras domestik semakin menurun dan kemandirian beras di Kabupaten Banyumas diperkirakan hanya sampai tahun 2029. Kesinambungan implementasi antar variabel penting, menjadi kunci tercapainya tujuan sistem, yaitu: 1) penetapan Peraturan Bupati tentang Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan (LP2B), 2) penetapan skema insentif perlindungan lahan, 3) membangun database spasial lahan sawah secara detail, dan 4) pengembangan akses air irigasi menjadi variabel yang harus dijalankan pada tahap awal sebagai prioritas pertama, kemudian tahap berikutnya pemberdayaan kelompok tani prioritas kedua, dan peningkatan produktivitas tanaman padi sebagai tahan selanjutnya. Aktor yang menjadi kunci penggerak sistem, yaitu Bupati beserta dinas terkait (Dinas Pertanian dan Ketahanan Pangan, Bappeda Litbang, Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Bidang Pengairan, Dinas Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman), DPRD, ATR/BPN.
##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##
Unduh
Referensi
Arnama, I.N. 2020. Pertumbuhan dan produksi varietas padi sawah (Oryza sativa L) dengan variasi jumlah bibit per rumpun. Perbal: Jurnal Pertanian Berkelanjutan, 8(2), 166-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.30605/perbal.v8i3.1546.
Aryani, D. 2018. Keragaan penawaran dan permintaan beras di Indonesia. Prosiding, Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal yang diselenggarakan oleh Universitas Sriwijaya, tanggal 18-19 Oktober 2018. Palembang: Unsri Press.
Barchia, M.F., Utama, S.P., Novanda, R.R., Ishak, A. 2020. Future uncertainty of sustainable paddy fields in Bengkulu Indonesia. Prosiding, Proceedings of the International Seminar on Promoting Local Resources for Sustainable Agriculture and Development. Atlantis Press.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2020. Luas panen dan produksi padi di Indonesia tahun 2019.
Chaeruman, N. 2013. Kajian adaptasi beberapa varietas unggul baru padi sawah berbasis pendekatan pengelolaan tanaman terpadu di dataran tinggi Tapanuli Utara Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Online Pertanian Tropic, 1(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.32734/jpt.v1i1.2867.
Chaifetz, A, Jagger, P. 2014. 40 Years of dialogue on food sovereignty: A review and a look ahead. Global Food Security, 3, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.04.002.
Clapp, J. 2017. Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy, 66, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001.
Databoks. 2024. Indonesia Impor Beras 3 Juta Ton pada 2023, Terbesar dalam Lima Tahun. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/01/16 [26 Jan 2024].
Daulay, A.R., Putri, E.I.K., Barus, B,. Noorachmat BP. 2016. Analsis faktor penyebab alih fungsi lahan sawah menjadi sawit di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 14(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v14n1.2016.1-15.
Febriana, W.D. 2017. Determinants of paddy field conversion in Java 1995-2013. Jurnal Bina Praja, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.09.2017.
Hartono, Karyaningsih, S. 2017. Keragaan pertumbuhan dan produksi varietas unggul baru (VUB) padi sawah di Kabupaten Jepara, Jawa Tengah. Pros Sem Nas Biodiv Indon, 1(1), 1666-1669. https://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m010723.
Kaswanto, R.L., Aurora, R.M., Yusri, D., Sjaf, S. 2021. Analisis faktor pendorong perubahan tutupan lahan selama satu dekade di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 19(1), 107-116.
[Kementan RI] Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. 2020. Statistik Lahan Pertanian Tahun 2015-2019. https://satudata-pertanian-go-id.webpkgcache.com/doc/-/s/satudata.pertanian.go.id/assets/docs/publikasi/Statistik_Lahan_Pertanian_Tahun_2015-2019.pdf.
Kulsum, U., Arifin, B., Abidin, Z. 2015. Determinan keputusan petani terhadap konversi lahan sawah menjadi permukiman. JIIA, 3(2), 187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v3i2.1038.
Krismawati, A., Arifin, Z. 2011. Stabilitas hasil beberapa varietas padi di lahan sawah. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, 14(2), 84-91. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/2028.
Mantali, M.A,. Rauf, A., Saleh, Y. 2021. Peran kelompok tani dalam meningkatkan produktivitas usahatani padi sawah (Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani di Desa Bongopini Kecamatan Tilongkabila Kabupaten Bone Bolango). AGRINESIA, 5(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.37046/agr.v5i2.11942.
Mulyani, A., Kuncoro, D., Nursyamsi, D., Agus, F. 2016. Analisis konversi lahan sawah: Penggunaan data spasial resolusi tinggi memperlihatkan laju konversi yang mengkhawatirkan. Jurnal Tanah dan Iklim, 40(2), 121-133.
Mulyani, A., Nutrsyamsu, D., Syakir, M. 2017. Strategi pemanfaatan sumberdaya lahan untuk pencapaian swasembada beras berkelanjutan. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 11(1), 11-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2018/jsdl.v11i1.8187.
Munibah, K., Yudarwati, R., Wahyunie, E.D., Wijaya, H. 2016. Protection of paddy field and recommendation of regional planning in Cianjur Regency, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 47. 1-11. https://doi.org/0.1088/1755-1315/47/1/012036.
Paipan, S., Abrar, M. 2020. Analisis kondisi ketergantungan impor beras di Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Ekonomi Darussalam, 6(2), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.24815/jped.v6i2.15000.
Purbiyanti, E., Yazid, M., Januarti, I. 2017. Konversi lahan sawah di Indonesia dan pengaruhnya terhadap kebijakan harga pembelian pemerintah (HPP) gabah/beras. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 14(3), 209-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.17358/jma.14.3.209.
Pusat Data dan Sistim Informasi Pertanian Kementan. 2022. Analisis Ketahanan Pangan Tahun 2022.
Rohaeni, W.R., Iqbal, M.I. 2015. Evaluasi varietas padi sawah pada display Varietas Unggul Baru (VUB) di Kabupaten Karawang, Jawa Barat. AGRIC, 27, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.24246/agric.2015.v27.i1.p1-7.
Ruiz, C.C. 2016. Food sovereighty and teritory: The domestic production unit as a basic premise. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Science, 223, 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.376.
Sari, A.R.K., Aryawati, S.A.N., Duwijana, I.N., Sukarja, I.M. 2020. Daya hasil tiga varietas unggul padi produksi Balitbangtan pada lahan biosilika di Bali. Prosiding, Peran Teaching Factory di Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan yang diselenggarakan oleh Politeknik Negeri Jember. Jember: Politeknik Negeri Jember.
Shcherbakova, A., Shcherbakov, D. 2018. The transformation of Asia food consumption and Rusia as a guarantor of food security in Asia. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 6(2), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.18588/201811.00a041.
Suhendra, T. 2010. Uji adaptasi varietas unggul dan galur harapan padi umur sangat genjah pada musim kemarau dan musim hujan di Kabupaten Sragen. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 15(1), 1-6. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/6505.
Swastika, D.K.S., Agustian, A., Suryana, A., Muslim, C., Sunarsih, Perdana, R.P. 2021. Tinjauan historis teknologi varietas unggulan dan program intensifikasi dalam peningkatan produktivitas padi berkelanjutan. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonom, 39(2), b 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/fae.v39n2.2021.103-114.
Arsyad, H., Syakhril, Riyanto,. 2014. Pengaruh pupuk nitrogen terhadap penampilan dan produktivitas Padi Inpari Sidenuk. Jurnal AGRIFOR, XIII(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.31293/af.v13i1.552.
Wahyunto, Widiastuti, F. 2014. Lahan sawah sebagai pendukung ketahanan pangan serta strategi pencapaian kemandirian pangan. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 8(3) 17-30. https://doi.org/10.2018/jsdl.v8i3.6479.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##PUBLICATION ETHICS
Jurnal Risalah Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian dan Lingkungan (JRKPL) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research to develop a coherent and respected network of landscape architecture knowledge. JRKPL committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics that clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing a scientific article in JRKPL.
As publisher of JRKPL, PSP3-LPPM IPB and PERHEPI takes its duties of guardianship all stages of publishing process and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.
Duties of Authors
An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is unacceptable and constitutes unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the manuscript and should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism are include passing off another paper as the author own paper, copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another paper (without attribution) and claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.
Duties of the Editorial Board
Review Process
JRKPL is committed to objective and fair double-blind peer-review to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. JRKPL chooses reviewers based on their expertise (whose most closely matches the topic of the paper). At least 2 reviewers are invited to evaluate a manuscript. In cases of controversy or disagreement regarding the merits of the work, an additional review will be solicited. The JRKPL editor mediates all interaction between authors and reviewers, and the review results owned by JRKPL.
Publication Decisions
The editor of a peer-reviewed JRKPL is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The final decision on article acceptance based on reviewer's opinions, suggestions, and comments. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
JRKPL evaluates manuscripts only based on the intellectual content. No race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophies of the authors are considered in the evaluation process.
Confidentiality
JRKPL assure the confidentially of the manuscripts, actors, and other related information on the publishing process. Only corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher are allows for the information.
Disclosure
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Duties of reviewers
(1) Objectivity: Reviewer should provide written and unbiased feedback to the authors, personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewer comments should be clearly with supporting arguments indicating whether the writing is concise and relevant
(2) Expertise: Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
(3) Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewer suggest relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors to improve the quality of the manuscript,
(4) Confidentiality: Reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
(5) Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer own research without the express written consent of the author. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
